Preemption question (4xx related)

Michel Dänzer michel at daenzer.net
Thu Jul 2 19:14:29 EST 2009


On Thu, 2009-07-02 at 08:13 +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> On Tue, 2009-06-30 at 05:55 -0700, Felix Radensky wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > Preemption is disabled on the vast majority of powerpc
> > targets. Are there any known problems in this area ?
> > I'd like to enable CONFIG_PREEMPT_VOLUNTARY on
> > AMCC 405EX target, to increase application responsiveness.
> > Is it a bad idea ?
> 
> In theory it should work, but as you may have noticed, it's generally
> disabled and thus not very well tested.
> 
> It would be a good idea for us, some of the core devs, to turn that on
> in our usual test configs in fact.

FWIW, on my PowerBook I've been running with CONFIG_PREEMPT_VOLUNTARY
enabled for a long time (more than a year). No problems so far, and it
definitely seems to help a lot for interactivity.


-- 
Earthling Michel Dänzer           |                http://www.vmware.com
Libre software enthusiast         |          Debian, X and DRI developer


More information about the Linuxppc-dev mailing list