linux-next: origin tree build failure
Stephen Rothwell
sfr at canb.auug.org.au
Wed Jan 14 03:31:20 EST 2009
Hi Ingo,
On Mon, 12 Jan 2009 10:32:14 +0100 Ingo Molnar <mingo at elte.hu> wrote:
>
> * Stephen Rothwell <sfr at canb.auug.org.au> wrote:
>
> > > It slipped through because it didnt get caught in build tests because
> > > cpufreq isnt enabled in the powerpc defconfig.
> >
> > Which is one of the reasons we have linux-next: "integration testing".
>
> Build bugs slipped through that net too in the past.
Of course they have.
> And we dont really want developers and maintainers to rely on an external
> middle man facility to be able to submit patches. So the best method is to
> make the defconfigs good enough to catch everyday build bugs. Random
> testing and linux-next can then catch the weird special cases as well.
linux-next is merely a tool - it can't catch anything if you don't use it.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell sfr at canb.auug.org.au
http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.ozlabs.org/pipermail/linuxppc-dev/attachments/20090114/3f49b229/attachment.pgp>
More information about the Linuxppc-dev
mailing list