Status of fsl booke TLB and ATMU patches
Kumar Gala
galak at kernel.crashing.org
Sun Jan 4 06:32:48 EST 2009
On Jan 2, 2009, at 11:30 PM, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> On Fri, 2009-01-02 at 16:18 -0800, Trent Piepho wrote:
>> 2.6.28 is out, can my existing patches be accepted?
>
> It's all FSL stuff and thus in Kumar's hands. I think there's a
> pending
> pull request from him tho, thus maybe they are in there already :-)
>
> I've just officially taken over so I'll scrub patchwork and
> outstanding
> sub maintainer pull requests if any early next week.
>
> Cheers,
> Ben.
Neither of these patch sets are in my pull request. The PCI ones
should be ok, but I need to review.
The TLB ones I'm still a bit concerned about their impact on the KVM
fsl-booke port.
>> [2/2] POWERPC/fsl-pci: Set relaxed ordering on prefetchable ranges
>> http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/14546/
>>
>> [1/2] POWERPC/fsl-pci: Better ATMU setup
>> http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/14544/
>>
>> [5/5] powerpc: booke: Allow larger CAM sizes than 256 MB
>> http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/12885/
>>
>> [4/5] powerpc: booke: Make CAM entries used for lowmem configurable
>> http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/12884/
>>
>> [3/5] powerpc: booke: Remove code duplication in lowmem mapping
>> http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/12883/
>>
>> [2/5] powerpc: booke: Remove num_tlbcam_entries
>> http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/12882/
>>
>> [1/5] powerpc: booke: Don't hard-code size of struct tlbcam
>> http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/12881/
>>
- k
More information about the Linuxppc-dev
mailing list