[PATCH 2/2] x86-64: seccomp: fix 32/64 syscall hole
Roland McGrath
roland at redhat.com
Sat Feb 28 18:36:04 EST 2009
> btw., shouldnt is_compat_task() expand to 0 in the
> !CONFIG_COMPAT case? That way we could remove this #ifdef too.
> (and move the first #ifdef inside the array initialization so
> that we always have a mode1_syscalls_32[] array.)
I guess you mean define it in linux/compat.h then?
Go right ahead. Whatever you want is fine by me.
Thanks,
Roland
More information about the Linuxppc-dev
mailing list