request_irq return errno 38
Vijay Nikam
vijay.t.nikam at gmail.com
Wed Feb 11 21:13:26 EST 2009
Ok ... so that means if I am writing driver for any device I need to
take care of this mapping ? ? ? I mean I should use virq ? ? ?
I read in LDD book, they give directly irq no. they have given
parallel port example, here they have set or said irq no. defaults to
7 and they have not done any irq_mapping so what is the difference ? ?
? I mean how I should know when to use irq_mapping and when not ? ? ?
Also is it some difference between writng drivers on embedded Linux
level and Linux PC (i386) ? ? ?
Sorry for perhaps these basic questions as kind of new to Linux kernel
programming ... :-)
Kindly please acknowledge ... thank you ...
Kind Regards,
Vijay Nikam
On 2/11/09, Michael Ellerman <michael at ellerman.id.au> wrote:
> On Wed, 2009-02-11 at 15:11 +0530, Vijay Nikam wrote:
> > Thanks for your prompt reply ...
> >
> > I am using kernel version 2.6.20 ...
>
> OK, that kernel has the irq remapping stuff.
>
> > May I know what raw IRQ means ? ? ? and what is the reason I cant map
> > raw_irq_number ???
>
> Sorry, that's not the best terminology.
>
> I guess the right name is hardware irq number.
>
> You can't map it because the kernel keeps a mapping between hardware irq
> numbers and virtual irq numbers. request_irq() expects a virtual irq
> number.
>
> cheers
>
> --
> Michael Ellerman
> OzLabs, IBM Australia Development Lab
>
> wwweb: http://michael.ellerman.id.au
> phone: +61 2 6212 1183 (tie line 70 21183)
>
> We do not inherit the earth from our ancestors,
> we borrow it from our children. - S.M.A.R.T Person
>
>
More information about the Linuxppc-dev
mailing list