FW: [PATCH] powerpc/mm: Export HPAGE_SHIFT

Benjamin Herrenschmidt benh at kernel.crashing.org
Wed Feb 4 12:50:48 EST 2009


On Tue, 2009-02-03 at 17:08 -0800, Roland Dreier wrote:
> Forwarding Eli's patch below, since PowerPC guys may have missed it.  I
> guess the question for Ben et al is whether there is any issue with
> exporting HPAGE_SHIFT for modules (can be EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL if you feel
> it's an internal detail).  It would probably make sense to roll this
> change into the mlx4 change that Eli alludes to below and merge through
> my tree (with ppc maintainer acks of course), rather than splitting this
> patch out and introducing cross-tree dependencies (and also separating
> the rationale for the change from the change itself).
> 
> Thanks,
>   Roland
> 
> 
> Drivers may want to take advantage of the large pages used for memory obtained
> from hugetlbfs. One example is mlx4_ib which can use much less MTT entries (in
> the order of HPAGE_SIZE / PAGE_SIZE) when registering such memory, thus scale
> significantly better when registering larger memory regions. Other drivers
> could also benefit from this.

Except that we support multiple large page sizes nowadays ... I think
the size can be specified per mountpoint of hugetlbfs no ? Thus things
like mellanox would have to query the page size used for a given
mapping.

Do the generic hugetlbfs code provides such an API ? If not, we may need
to add one.

Cheers,
Ben.

> Signed-off-by: Eli Cohen <eli at mellanox.co.il>
> ---
>  arch/powerpc/mm/hash_utils_64.c |    1 +
>  1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/mm/hash_utils_64.c b/arch/powerpc/mm/hash_utils_64.c
> index 8d5b475..6cff8c7 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/mm/hash_utils_64.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/mm/hash_utils_64.c
> @@ -104,6 +104,7 @@ int mmu_highuser_ssize = MMU_SEGSIZE_256M;
>  u16 mmu_slb_size = 64;
>  #ifdef CONFIG_HUGETLB_PAGE
>  unsigned int HPAGE_SHIFT;
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(HPAGE_SHIFT);
>  #endif
>  #ifdef CONFIG_PPC_64K_PAGES
>  int mmu_ci_restrictions;




More information about the Linuxppc-dev mailing list