[RFC PATCH v2 0/6] powerpc: nintendo wii support

Grant Likely grant.likely at secretlab.ca
Sat Dec 12 17:47:58 EST 2009


On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 5:18 PM, Albert Herranz <albert_herranz at yahoo.es> wrote:
> Grant Likely wrote:
>> Hi Albert.
>>
>
> Hi,
>
>> I'm ready to pick up your Gamecube and Wii patch sets for merging.
>> You seem to have 4 distinct patch sets.  What order do they need to be
>> applied in, and what kernel version are they based on?
>>
>
> The patches were based on 2.6.32-rc8.
> The apply order should be:
>
> v2 powerpc: nintendo gamecube support
>  powerpc: gamecube/wii: usbgecko bootwrapper console support
>  powerpc: gamecube: device tree
>  powerpc: gamecube: bootwrapper bits
>  powerpc: gamecube/wii: introduce GAMECUBE_COMMON
>  powerpc: gamecube/wii: declare as non-coherent platforms
>  powerpc: gamecube/wii: do not include PCI support
>  powerpc: gamecube/wii: udbg support for usbgecko
>  powerpc: gamecube/wii: flipper interrupt controller support
>  powerpc: gamecube: platform support
>  powerpc: gamecube: default config
>
> v2 powerpc: nintendo wii support
>  powerpc: wii: device tree
>  powerpc: wii: bootwrapper bits
>  powerpc: broadway processor support
>  powerpc: wii: hollywood interrupt controller support
>  powerpc: wii: platform support
>  powerpc: wii: default config
>
> v4 rework of usbgecko-based early debug
>  powerpc: reserve fixmap entries for early debug
>  powerpc: gamecube/wii: early debugging using usbgecko
>
> v2 powerpc: wii: mem2 as ram support
>  wii: bootwrapper: add fixup to calc useable mem2
>  wii: use both mem1 and mem2 as ram
>  powerpc: allow ioremap within reserved memory regions
>  powerpc: wii: allow ioremap within the memory hole
>
> But if you prefer it, I can re-send them as one patch set again rebased on top of v2.6.32.

Hmmm..  Looks like there are some inconsistencies in here.  For
example, the 7th patch of the first series, and the 2nd patch of the
3rd series are different version of the same thing.  The whole thing
doesn't apply as is.  Reposting the current state of the whole series
would help.  Add any acked-by lines that you've received from Ben,
Segher, or anybody else before you repost so I can see the full
current state.

Thanks
g.

-- 
Grant Likely, B.Sc., P.Eng.
Secret Lab Technologies Ltd.


More information about the Linuxppc-dev mailing list