simple gpio driver

[Heiko Schocher]

Hello Grant,

Grant Likely wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 11:49 PM, Heiko Schocher<hs at denx.de> wrote:
>> Hello Anton,
>>
>> i am trying to use the arch/powerpc/sysdev/simple_gpio.c driver,
>> for accessing some gpios, and found, that u8_gpio_get()
>> returns not only a 1 or a 0, instead it returns the real bit
>> position from the gpio:
>>
>> gpio    return
>> base    value
>> 0       0/0x01
>> 1       0/0x02
>> 2       0/0x04
>> 3       0/0x08
>> 4       0/0x10
>> 5       0/0x20
>> 6       0/0x40
>> 7       0/0x80
>>
>> I also use the arch/powerpc/platforms/52xx/mpc52xx_gpio.c and
>> mpc52xx_gpt.c drivers, they all return for a gpio just a 1 or 0,
>> which seems correct to me, because a gpio can have only 1 or 0
>> as state ... what do you think?
> 
> I think returning '1' is perhaps slightly 'better' (however you define

Yep.

> that), but I don't think the caller should make any assumptions beyond
> zero/non-zero.

Hmm... why? I think a gpio_pin can have as value only 0 or 1.
Ah, if you say zero versus non zero ... hmm... okay.

>> I solved this issue (if it is) with the following patch:
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/sysdev/simple_gpio.c b/arch/powerpc/sysdev/simple_gpio.c
>> index 43c4569..bb0d79c 100644
>> --- a/arch/powerpc/sysdev/simple_gpio.c
>> +++ b/arch/powerpc/sysdev/simple_gpio.c
>> @@ -46,7 +46,7 @@ static int u8_gpio_get(struct gpio_chip *gc, unsigned int gpio)
>>  {
>>        struct of_mm_gpio_chip *mm_gc = to_of_mm_gpio_chip(gc);
>>
>> -       return in_8(mm_gc->regs) & u8_pin2mask(gpio);
>> +       return (in_8(mm_gc->regs) & u8_pin2mask(gpio) ? 1 : 0);
> 
> For clarity, the brackets should be just around the & operands, and
> "!= 0" instead of "? 1 : 0" might result in slightly smaller code.
> 
> return (in_8(mm_gc->regs) & u8_pin2mask(gpio)) != 0;

Yep, you are right, thanks for the info.

bye
Heiko
-- 
DENX Software Engineering GmbH,     MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany