[v3][PATCH][powerpc/85xx] P2020RDB Platform Support Added
Aggrwal Poonam-B10812
Poonam.Aggrwal at freescale.com
Wed Aug 12 00:02:05 EST 2009
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Kumar Gala [mailto:galak at kernel.crashing.org]
> Sent: Tuesday, August 11, 2009 7:11 PM
> To: Aggrwal Poonam-B10812
> Cc: linuxppc-dev at ozlabs.org
> Subject: Re: [v3][PATCH][powerpc/85xx] P2020RDB Platform Support Added
>
>
> On Aug 7, 2009, at 10:35 AM, Poonam Aggrwal wrote:
>
> >
> > + enet2: ethernet at 26000 {
> > + #address-cells = <1>;
> > + #size-cells = <1>;
> > + cell-index = <2>;
> > + device_type = "network";
> > + model = "eTSEC";
> > + compatible = "gianfar";
> > + reg = <0x26000 0x1000>;
> > + ranges = <0x0 0x26000 0x1000>;
> > + local-mac-address = [ 00 00 00 00 00 00 ];
> > + interrupts = <31 2 32 2 33 2>;
> > + interrupt-parent = <&mpic>;
> > + phy-handle = <&phy1>;
> > + phy-connection-type = "rgmii-id";
> > + };
>
> was there an answer to why we don't have an mdio node for enet2?
>
Yes I already replied to it, actually the enet2 (eTSEC3) on RDB is only
exposed as RGMII, and the mdio lines it will use is those of enet0. In
case it also could be configured in SGMII(as in P2020DS), then we would
have needed the mdio node for enet2 to configure the TBI PHY.
> - k
>
More information about the Linuxppc-dev
mailing list