[PATCH] Do not inline putprops function
M. Mohan Kumar
mohan at in.ibm.com
Mon Aug 3 15:49:19 EST 2009
On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 10:27:43AM +1000, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> On Tue, 2009-06-23 at 09:56 -0400, Neil Horman wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 06:25:34PM +0530, M. Mohan Kumar wrote:
> > >
> > Well it definately looks like removing that variable had some code changes.
> > It'll take some time to match it up to source, but Most interesting I think is
> > the variance in putprops around address f34. Looks like its doing some string
> > maniuplation in a reversed order, using a huge offset. Might be worthwhile to
> > check to see if theres any string overruns in this code.
> Yeah I still suspect it's just a bug in the code that's being exposed
The same code works with gcc-3.4.
> Mohan, can you try running it under valgrind?
Still I am not able to use valgrind to debug kexec-tools
M. Mohan Kumar.
More information about the Linuxppc-dev