[PATCH 1/6] powerpc: Move #ifdef'ed body of do_IRQ() into a separate function
galak at kernel.crashing.org
Wed Apr 29 22:48:04 EST 2009
On Apr 29, 2009, at 6:44 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 10:49:07AM +1000, Michael Ellerman wrote:
>> On Sat, 2009-04-25 at 20:18 +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>>> On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 11:31:37AM +1000, Michael Ellerman wrote:
>>>> +#ifdef CONFIG_IRQSTACKS
>>> Wasn't there a plan to make CONFIG_IRQSTACKS the unconditional
>> Not sure. Looks like the 64-bit configs all turn it on, and all but
>> or two of the 32-bit configs don't.
> Yeah, but do they have a reason not to turn it on? Having irqstacks
> is a lot safer than no having it because the stack useage is a lot
> predictable. And not having to maintain two codepathes is also a
> benefit all by itself.
I think Ben, Paul and I had discussed just universally enabling it.
Can't remember why Ben hadn't done that yet.
More information about the Linuxppc-dev