Please revert edada399 and 9203fc9c

[Benjamin Herrenschmidt]

On Tue, 2009-04-28 at 10:35 +0200, Sam Ravnborg wrote:

> This is partly my fault :-(
> I acked them as I did not see the issue with conditional branches.
> Could I ask you to add a comment to the lds file about this.

I'm back :-)

Not a huge deal per-se, it's just that the patches were merged in Linus
tree only a few hours after being initially submitted it seems, which
doesn't leave much chance for anybody to test, to hit -next, or anything
like that... that was a little bit too trigger happy .

Cheers,
Ben.