grant.likely at secretlab.ca
Thu Apr 23 23:54:55 EST 2009
On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 3:39 PM, Kumar Gala <galak at kernel.crashing.org> wrote:
> On Apr 22, 2009, at 4:33 PM, Timur Tabi wrote:
>> Kumar Gala wrote:
>>> I disagree. If you update your kernel you should update your device
>>> tree (thus we have .dts in the kernel tree and not somewhere else).
>> Is this a new policy? I was under the impression that supporting older
>> device trees, if not too inconvenient, is desirable. I've nack'd
>> patches before that broke backwards compatibility unnecessarily.
> The specific issue I'm talking about is the addition of new nodes that might
> break old device trees. I have no desire to try and say that I can't add
> new nodes and code related to them just because old device tree's didn't
> have them.
Ah... yes, you're right. Never mind my previous reply.
Grant Likely, B.Sc., P.Eng.
Secret Lab Technologies Ltd.
More information about the Linuxppc-dev