timur at freescale.com
Thu Apr 23 07:57:58 EST 2009
Kumar Gala wrote:
> New nodes. For example I've proposed a "local access window" node.
> Once I add it I plan on changing code to use it. This will break an
> old device tree booting with the new kernel and I'm completely ok with
Are we having two different conversations? I was talking about this
block from your email:
>> arch/powerpc/include/asm/cpm2.h:#define CPM_MAP_ADDR (get_immrbase() +
>> arch/powerpc/sysdev/cpm2.c: cpm2_immr = ioremap(get_immrbase(),
>> these two are related and seem like we could look for "fsl,cpm2"
> That's okay, as long as you don't break compatibility with older
> device trees that don't have that property, unless you can demonstrate
> that these trees would never work with the current kernel anyway.
Specifically, I was referring to this comment:
these two are related and seem like we could look for "fsl,cpm2"
And my point was that not all device trees have "fsl,cpm2" in their CPM
Linux kernel developer at Freescale
More information about the Linuxppc-dev