Proposed prom parse fix + moving.
Grant Likely
grant.likely at secretlab.ca
Sat Apr 18 15:35:42 EST 2009
On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 4:07 PM, Ilpo Järvinen
<ilpo.jarvinen at helsinki.fi> wrote:
> On Fri, 17 Apr 2009, Ilpo Järvinen wrote:
>
>> On Fri, 17 Apr 2009, Michal Simek wrote:
>>
>> > Grant Likely wrote:
>> > > On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 12:08 AM, Michal Simek <monstr at monstr.eu> wrote:
>> > >> Hi All,
>> > >>
>> > >> I have got email from Ilpo about prom_parse file.
>> > >> I take this file from powerpc. Who did write prom_parse file and take care about?
>> > >
>> > > Posting to the linuxppc-dev list is sufficient to start. There are
>> > > several people who may be interested.
>> > >
>> > >> BTW: What about to move prom_parse file to any generic location as we discussed in past?
>> > >> Any volunteer?
>> > >
>> > > I'm kind of working on it. More specifically, I'm looking at
>> > > factoring out fdt stuff into common code (drivers/of/of_fdt.c). But I
>> > > haven't made a whole lot of progress yet.
>> > >
>> > >> -------- Original Message --------
>> > >> Subject: [RFC!] [PATCH] microblaze: fix bug in error handling
>> > >> Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2009 23:05:53 +0300 (EEST)
>> > >> From: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen at helsinki.fi>
>> > >> To: monstr at monstr.eu
>> > >> CC: microblaze-uclinux at itee.uq.edu.au
>> > >>
>> > >> While some version of the patches were on the lkml I read
>> > >> some part of the code briefly through but my feedback got
>> > >> stuck into postponed emails, so here's one correctness
>> > >> related issue I might have found (the rest were just
>> > >> cosmetic things).
>> > >>
>> > >> I'm not sure if the latter return needs the of_node_put or not
>> > >> but it seems more likely than not.
>> > >
>> > > Yes, it does. This change is applicable to
>> > > arch/powerpc/kernel/prom_parse.c too.
>> >
>> > ok.
>> > Ilpo: Can you create patch for both architectures?
>>
>> Sure, but tomorrow as today is a deadline day :-).
>
> Ok, here's combined patch for both. I came up with slightly
> shorter and (IMHO) nicer variant for -EINVAL assignment than
> in the first version.
>
> --
> [PATCH] powerpc & microblaze: add missing of_node_put to error handling
>
> While reviewing some microblaze patches a while ago, I noticed
> a suspicious error handling in of_irq_map_one(), which turned
> out to be a copy from arch/powerpc. Grant Likely
> <grant.likely at secretlab.ca> confirmed that this is a real bug.
>
> Merge error handling paths using goto with the normal return
> path.
>
> Powerppc compile tested.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen at helsinki.fi>
Looks right to me (but I haven't tested).
Acked-by: Grant Likely <grant.likely at secretlab.ca>
> ---
> arch/microblaze/kernel/prom_parse.c | 11 +++++------
> arch/powerpc/kernel/prom_parse.c | 11 +++++------
> 2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/microblaze/kernel/prom_parse.c b/arch/microblaze/kernel/prom_parse.c
> index ae0352e..d16c32f 100644
> --- a/arch/microblaze/kernel/prom_parse.c
> +++ b/arch/microblaze/kernel/prom_parse.c
> @@ -903,7 +903,7 @@ int of_irq_map_one(struct device_node *device,
> struct device_node *p;
> const u32 *intspec, *tmp, *addr;
> u32 intsize, intlen;
> - int res;
> + int res = -EINVAL;
>
> pr_debug("of_irq_map_one: dev=%s, index=%d\n",
> device->full_name, index);
> @@ -926,21 +926,20 @@ int of_irq_map_one(struct device_node *device,
>
> /* Get size of interrupt specifier */
> tmp = of_get_property(p, "#interrupt-cells", NULL);
> - if (tmp == NULL) {
> - of_node_put(p);
> - return -EINVAL;
> - }
> + if (tmp == NULL)
> + goto out;
> intsize = *tmp;
>
> pr_debug(" intsize=%d intlen=%d\n", intsize, intlen);
>
> /* Check index */
> if ((index + 1) * intsize > intlen)
> - return -EINVAL;
> + goto out;
>
> /* Get new specifier and map it */
> res = of_irq_map_raw(p, intspec + index * intsize, intsize,
> addr, out_irq);
> +out:
> of_node_put(p);
> return res;
> }
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/prom_parse.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/prom_parse.c
> index 8f0856f..8362620 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/prom_parse.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/prom_parse.c
> @@ -971,7 +971,7 @@ int of_irq_map_one(struct device_node *device, int index, struct of_irq *out_irq
> struct device_node *p;
> const u32 *intspec, *tmp, *addr;
> u32 intsize, intlen;
> - int res;
> + int res = -EINVAL;
>
> DBG("of_irq_map_one: dev=%s, index=%d\n", device->full_name, index);
>
> @@ -995,21 +995,20 @@ int of_irq_map_one(struct device_node *device, int index, struct of_irq *out_irq
>
> /* Get size of interrupt specifier */
> tmp = of_get_property(p, "#interrupt-cells", NULL);
> - if (tmp == NULL) {
> - of_node_put(p);
> - return -EINVAL;
> - }
> + if (tmp == NULL)
> + goto out;
> intsize = *tmp;
>
> DBG(" intsize=%d intlen=%d\n", intsize, intlen);
>
> /* Check index */
> if ((index + 1) * intsize > intlen)
> - return -EINVAL;
> + goto out;
>
> /* Get new specifier and map it */
> res = of_irq_map_raw(p, intspec + index * intsize, intsize,
> addr, out_irq);
> +out:
> of_node_put(p);
> return res;
> }
> --
> 1.5.6.5
>
--
Grant Likely, B.Sc., P.Eng.
Secret Lab Technologies Ltd.
More information about the Linuxppc-dev
mailing list