[PATCH] Add hvc_console to MAINTAINERS
Josh Boyer
jwboyer at linux.vnet.ibm.com
Wed Apr 1 10:52:48 EST 2009
On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 02:40:58PM -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
>On Tue, 2009-03-31 at 14:22 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
>> On Tue, 31 Mar 2009 14:10:23 -0700
>> Joe Perches <joe at perches.com> wrote:
>> > On Tue, 2009-03-31 at 09:29 -0400, Josh Boyer wrote:
>> > > Add a MAINTAINERS entry for the hypervisor virtual console support
>> > > used on IBM POWER servers.
>> > > diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS
>> > > index c5f4e9d..387ad45 100644
>> > > --- a/MAINTAINERS
>> > > +++ b/MAINTAINERS
>> > > @@ -2176,6 +2176,11 @@ W: http://www.ia64-linux.org/
>> > > T: git kernel.org:/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/aegl/linux-2.6.git
>> > > S: Maintained
>> > >
>> > > +IBM HYPERVISOR VIRTUAL CONSOLE
>> > > +P: Several
>> > > +L: linuxppc-dev at ozlabs.org
>> > > +S: Maintained
>> > > +
>> > > IBM MCA SCSI SUBSYSTEM DRIVER
>> > > P: Michael Lang
>> > > M: langa2 at kph.uni-mainz.de
>> >
>> > I think this sort of entry should not be acceptable.
>> > Maintainers should have individual names and contact addresses.
>>
>> There isn't a maintainer.
>>
>> But people send patches to the wrong list, so the ppc guys (who use
>> this driver) don't get to see them.
>>
>> That's a practical, real-world problem. We should have a fix for it.
>>
>> > An exploder entry should be OK though.
>> > For instance, the DVB subsystem:
>> >
>> > DVB SUBSYSTEM AND DRIVERS
>> > P: LinuxTV.org Project
>> > M: linux-media at vger.kernel.org
>> >
>> > A list entry could be something like:
>> >
>> > P: Linux PCMCIA Team
>> > L: linux-pcmcia at lists.infradead.org
>> >
>>
>> I'm unclear on what the difference is here..
>
>I have no problem with the "L: list" entry.
>I think that's good. Along with some file
>matching pattern as well of course...
>
>I think the "P: Several" entry is not good.
>
>"Several" doesn't give any idea as to who
>actually does the work.
I copied that from something else in MAINTAINERS. I believe it
was the KERNEL JANITORS entry. I guess I should have known better
than to copy from that...
>If the "P:" entry is there at all, it should
>be the list name.
>
>Maybe "P: Linux PPC Development Team" or
>something similar.
Except that isn't right for the reasons Michael specified.
josh
More information about the Linuxppc-dev
mailing list