Please pull from 'for-2.6.27'

[Scott Wood]

On Wed, Sep 17, 2008 at 12:29:55PM +0200, Jochen Friedrich wrote:
> > It doesn't even tell me why not being thread-safe is a problem on a
> > UP machine.

Preemption.

> This isn't a regression since the stuff is new in 2.6.27. IMHO this can
> wait until 2.6.28.

It would be a bug in 2.6.27 that did not exist in 2.6.26...  is there
anything that used to use another mechanism that now uses this?

That's not to say that it's necessarily critical enough this late in the
process, but in general I'm not very comfortable with not being able to
fix newly added code as soon as the merge window closes because it's not
a "regression".

-Scott