demuxing irqs

[Stephen Neuendorffer]

It doesn't seem to me that the problem (hierarchical interrupts) is one
that only happens with GPIOs, so why treat them specially?  Since there
seems to be a reasonable solution that keeps them in a
separate namespace, that seems like the better way to go...

Steve

> -----Original Message-----
> From: linuxppc-dev-bounces+stephen.neuendorffer=xilinx.com at ozlabs.org
[mailto:linuxppc-dev-
> bounces+stephen.neuendorffer=xilinx.com at ozlabs.org] On Behalf Of Jon
Smirl
> Sent: Wednesday, September 17, 2008 7:09 AM
> To: avorontsov at ru.mvista.com
> Cc: Scott Wood; linuxppc-dev; Roland Dreier
> Subject: Re: demuxing irqs
> 
> Both solutions can be implemented. This is really a question of style.
> Since this impacts all of the PowerPC implementations we should get
> feedback from more people  I'll go along with whatever the group
> wants.
> 
> The basic question is: Should GPIOs and VIRQs each have their own
> namespace, or should there be a single unified namespace?
> 
> --
> Jon Smirl
> jonsmirl at gmail.com
> _______________________________________________
> Linuxppc-dev mailing list
> Linuxppc-dev at ozlabs.org
> https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev


This email and any attachments are intended for the sole use of the named recipient(s) and contain(s) confidential information that may be proprietary, privileged or copyrighted under applicable law. If you are not the intended recipient, do not read, copy, or forward this email message or any attachments. Delete this email message and any attachments immediately.