[PATCH] powerpc: enforce a non-spe kernel build even on broken compilers
Kumar Gala
galak at kernel.crashing.org
Wed Oct 15 08:23:05 EST 2008
On Sep 1, 2008, at 9:23 AM, Sebastian Siewior wrote:
> From: Thiemo Seufer <ths at linutronix.de>
>
> those two are requried on my fresh gcc 4.3.1
>
> Signed-off-by: Thiemo Seufer <ths at linutronix.de>
> Signed-off-by: Sebastian Siewior <bigeasy at linutronix.de>
> ---
> Not sure if this is intendent or a gcc bug but with -mno-spe
> the spe opcodes were not used floating point anymore but
> for 64bit save/restore for instance.
what code is getting generated for you that is causing issue?
> arch/powerpc/Makefile | 3 +++
> 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/Makefile b/arch/powerpc/Makefile
> index b7d4c4c..3727e4f 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/Makefile
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/Makefile
> @@ -108,7 +108,10 @@ endif
> KBUILD_CFLAGS += $(call cc-option,-mno-altivec)
>
> # No SPE instruction when building kernel
> +# (We use all available options to help semi-broken compilers)
> KBUILD_CFLAGS += $(call cc-option,-mno-spe)
> +KBUILD_CFLAGS += $(call cc-option,-mspe=no)
Why does -mno-spe work?
From my gcc-4.3 info pages:
`-mspe=YES/NO'
This option has been deprecated. Use `-mspe' and `-mno-spe'
instead.
> +KBUILD_CFLAGS += $(call cc-option,-mabi=no-spe)
is the -mabi=no-spe really needed?
- k
More information about the Linuxppc-dev
mailing list