[RFC 0/6] Proposal for a Generic PWM Device API

[Haavard Skinnemoen]

Bill Gatliff <bgat at billgatliff.com> wrote:
> Paul Mundt wrote:
> > This is likely because some of those lists are subscribers only, so cross
> > posting is poor form. It makes sense to keep the discussion in one place,
> > and to send notification messages with a pointer to the list archives to
> > the other lists so folks can jump in if they really care. Splitting it
> > out doesn't help matters in the least, but unfortunately this is what
> > seems to happen the most when subscribers only lists are involved.  
> 
> Alright, then maybe I can do this when I post the "final" changeset for review:
> cross-post to lkml and linux-embedded, and then post one short note on l-a-k,
> linuxppc-dev and elsewhere that refers those interested to the actual content.
> I can live with that.

Feel free to cross-post to kernel at avr32linux.org. It's open for
non-subscribers, and there may be people interested in PWM there
(especially since you include a driver for the PWM hardware on AVR32
devices.)

Haavard