[PATCH] kexec memory ranges dynamic allocation
horms at verge.net.au
Mon Nov 3 10:41:11 EST 2008
On Sat, Nov 01, 2008 at 11:43:15AM +0300, Maxim Uvarov wrote:
> 2008/11/1 Simon Horman <horms at verge.net.au>
> > On Fri, Oct 31, 2008 at 09:53:23AM +0300, Maxim Uvarov wrote:
> > > 2008/10/31 Simon Horman <horms at verge.net.au>
> > >
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > Could someone please comment on the satus of this patch?
> > > >
> > > Hello, Simon
> > >
> > > I can not reproduce error which you wrote before on my target. So it is
> > a
> > > little bit
> > > difficult to say what was wrong exactly.
> > Hi,
> > the version of the patch below (which I think is the latest)
> > compiles fine for me. I wanted to confirm that you
> > and Chandru are happy for it to be merged.
> > If so, could you please provide a short descripton for the change-log
> > and a Signed-off-by line.
> Patch looks good.
> Description is:
> Do not count max_memory_range for allocation. Increase allocation
> when it is needed. This actually allows us to avoid a lot of troubles
> various device-tree files.
> Signed-off-by: Maxim Uvarov <muvarov at gmail.com>
VA Linux Systems Japan K.K., Sydney, Australia Satellite Office
H: www.vergenet.net/~horms/ W: www.valinux.co.jp/en
More information about the Linuxppc-dev