[PATCH] kexec memory ranges dynamic allocation

[Simon Horman]

On Sat, Nov 01, 2008 at 11:43:15AM +0300, Maxim Uvarov wrote:
> 2008/11/1 Simon Horman <horms at verge.net.au>
> 
> > On Fri, Oct 31, 2008 at 09:53:23AM +0300, Maxim Uvarov wrote:
> > > 2008/10/31 Simon Horman <horms at verge.net.au>
> > >
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > Could someone please comment on the satus of this patch?
> > > >
> > > Hello,  Simon
> > >
> > > I can not reproduce  error which you wrote before on my target. So it is
> > a
> > > little bit
> > > difficult to say what  was wrong exactly.
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > the version of the patch below (which I think is the latest)
> > compiles fine for me. I wanted to confirm that you
> > and Chandru are happy for it to be merged.
> >
> > If so, could you please provide a short descripton for the change-log
> > and a Signed-off-by line.
> 
> Patch looks good.
> 
> Description is:
>    Do not count  max_memory_range for allocation. Increase allocation
> buffers
>    when it is needed. This actually allows us to avoid a lot of troubles
> with
>    various device-tree files.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Maxim Uvarov <muvarov at gmail.com>

Thanks, applied.

-- 
Simon Horman
  VA Linux Systems Japan K.K., Sydney, Australia Satellite Office
  H: www.vergenet.net/~horms/             W: www.valinux.co.jp/en