[POWERPC][v2] Bolt in SLB entry for kernel stack on secondary cpus
    Paul Mackerras 
    paulus at samba.org
       
    Fri May  2 19:03:50 EST 2008
    
    
  
David Gibson writes:
> Do you even need the processor ID test at all?  The boot processor
> should always have its stack covered by SLB entry 0 when we come
> through here, shouldn't it?
I was concerned that get_paca()->kstack wouldn't have been initialized
by the time the boot cpu calls slb_initialize().  If that fear is
unfounded then the check could go.
Paul.
    
    
More information about the Linuxppc-dev
mailing list