[PATCH v2 4/6] [POWERPC] QE: implement support for the GPIO LIB API
timur at freescale.com
Thu May 1 09:03:45 EST 2008
Anton Vorontsov wrote:
> What is the problem with returning (int)(u32 & u32) value?
Technically, a signed int is smaller than an unsigned int, so a value of
0x80000000 won't fit in an 'int'.
> You've asked to remove "!!" stuff and now purposing exactly the
> same... :-?
The !! stuff was because the function was returning a boolean value, so non-zero
== TRUE. I don't think the return value from 'get' is a technically a boolean,
so I'm assuming that the spec says the return value should be 0 or 1, to reflect
the value of that GPIO pin.
Linux kernel developer at Freescale
More information about the Linuxppc-dev