Missing patch for MPC5200B register definitions?

[Grant Likely]

On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 10:48 AM, Matt Sealey <matt at genesi-usa.com> wrote:
> Oh yes, I forgot.. also, the new MPC5121E stuff includes a lot of unions and
>  defines to make using both PSC formats easier.
>
>  Since the MPC5200 and MPC5200B PSC structures are different (CCR size), can the
>  original suggestion (in that thread) to support both with a union and some
>  defines to make supporting both CCR sizes, be implemented, or do we still think
>  that MPC5200 (not B) is not worth supporting?

Until someone writes a driver actually using it; let's pretend it
doesn't exist.  :-)  It's not too difficult to add it back in at a
later date if someone does decide to support it.

Cheers,
g.

-- 
Grant Likely, B.Sc., P.Eng.
Secret Lab Technologies Ltd.