OF compatible MTD platform RAM driver ?
Sergei Shtylyov
sshtylyov at ru.mvista.com
Thu Mar 27 02:40:56 EST 2008
Segher Boessenkool wrote:
>> - Using another device node with a compatible value set to
>> "linear-ram" (or
>> something similar). This would support both volatile and non-volatile
>> devices, and a property could be added to specify if the device is
>> volatile
>> or not.
> "memory-mapped-memory" perhaps :-)
> Or, just "memory". Although that one might play havoc with some
I'd suggest "ram" and "rom" then. Luckily the device trees don't contain
binding for the real RAM chips yet. :-)
> not-quite-correct main memory probing code.
You mean the there's parsers that search the "compatible" prop for
"memory" as well as "device_type" prop?
> Segher
WBR, Sergei
More information about the Linuxppc-dev
mailing list