OF compatible MTD platform RAM driver ?
    Sergei Shtylyov 
    sshtylyov at ru.mvista.com
       
    Thu Mar 27 02:40:56 EST 2008
    
    
  
Segher Boessenkool wrote:
>> - Using another device node with a compatible value set to 
>> "linear-ram" (or
>> something similar). This would support both volatile and non-volatile
>> devices, and a property could be added to specify if the device is 
>> volatile
>> or not.
> "memory-mapped-memory" perhaps :-)
> Or, just "memory".  Although that one might play havoc with some
    I'd suggest "ram" and "rom" then. Luckily the device trees don't contain 
binding for the real RAM chips yet. :-)
> not-quite-correct main memory probing code.
    You mean the there's parsers that search the "compatible" prop for 
"memory" as well as "device_type" prop?
> Segher
WBR, Sergei
    
    
More information about the Linuxppc-dev
mailing list