[PATCH 1/2 v3] Driver for Freescale 8610 and 5121 DIU
Scott Wood
scottwood at freescale.com
Wed Mar 26 09:19:17 EST 2008
York Sun wrote:
> + Example (MPC8610HPCD)
> + diu at 2c000 {
display at 2c000
> + device_type = "lcd";
No device_type.
> + compatible = "fsl-diu";
"fsl,diu".
> + s) Freescale on board FPGA
> +
> + This is the memory-mapped registers for on board FPGA.
> +
> + Required properities:
> + - compatible : should be "fsl,fpga-pixis".
> + - reg : should contain the address and the lenght of the FPPGA register
> + set.
> +
> + Example (MPC8610HPCD)
> + fpga {
board-control at e8000000 {
> +config FB_FSL_DIU
> + tristate "Freescale MPC8610/MPC5121 DIU framebuffer support"
Are these the only chips that will ever implement this?
> + depends on FB && (MPC8610 || MPC5121)
depends on FB && FSL_SOC
> + cmfbi = machine_data->fsl_diu_info[index+1]->par;
> + if ((mfbi->x_aoi_d + var->xres) >
> + machine_data->fsl_diu_info[0]->var.xres)
> + mfbi->x_aoi_d = machine_data->fsl_diu_info[0]->var.xres
> + - var->xres;
> + if (mfbi->x_aoi_d < 0)
> + mfbi->x_aoi_d = 0;
> + if ((var->xres + mfbi->x_aoi_d) >
> + machine_data->fsl_diu_info[0]->var.xres)
> + var->xres = machine_data->fsl_diu_info[0]->var.xres
> + - mfbi->x_aoi_d;
> +
> + if (cmfbi->count > 0) { /* AOI1 is open */
> + if ((mfbi->y_aoi_d + var->yres) > cmfbi->y_aoi_d)
> + mfbi->y_aoi_d = cmfbi->y_aoi_d - var->yres;
> + if (mfbi->y_aoi_d < 0)
> + mfbi->y_aoi_d = 0;
> + if ((var->yres + mfbi->y_aoi_d) > cmfbi->y_aoi_d)
> + var->yres = cmfbi->y_aoi_d - mfbi->y_aoi_d;
> + } else { /* AOI1 is close */
> + if ((mfbi->y_aoi_d + var->yres) >
> + machine_data->fsl_diu_info[0]->var.yres)
> + mfbi->y_aoi_d =
> + machine_data->fsl_diu_info[0]->var.yres
> + - var->yres;
> + if (mfbi->y_aoi_d < 0)
> + mfbi->y_aoi_d = 0;
> + if ((var->yres + mfbi->y_aoi_d) >
> + machine_data->fsl_diu_info[0]->var.yres)
> + var->yres =
> + machine_data->fsl_diu_info[0]->var.yres
> + - mfbi->y_aoi_d;
> + }
> + break;
> + case 2: /* AOI 1 */
> + case 4:
> + pmfbi = machine_data->fsl_diu_info[index-1]->par;
> + if ((mfbi->x_aoi_d + var->xres) >
> + machine_data->fsl_diu_info[0]->var.xres)
> + mfbi->x_aoi_d = machine_data->fsl_diu_info[0]->var.xres
> + - var->xres;
> + if (mfbi->x_aoi_d < 0)
> + mfbi->x_aoi_d = 0;
> + if ((var->xres + mfbi->x_aoi_d) >
> + machine_data->fsl_diu_info[0]->var.xres)
> + var->xres = machine_data->fsl_diu_info[0]->var.xres
> + - mfbi->x_aoi_d;
> +
> + if (pmfbi->count > 0) { /* AOI0 is open */
> + if ((mfbi->y_aoi_d + var->yres) >
> + machine_data->fsl_diu_info[0]->var.yres)
> + mfbi->y_aoi_d =
> + machine_data->fsl_diu_info[0]->var.yres
> + - var->yres;
> + if (mfbi->y_aoi_d < (pmfbi->y_aoi_d +
> + machine_data->fsl_diu_info[index-1]->var.yres))
> + mfbi->y_aoi_d = pmfbi->y_aoi_d +
> + machine_data->fsl_diu_info[index-1]->var.yres;
> + if ((var->yres + mfbi->y_aoi_d) >
> + machine_data->fsl_diu_info[0]->var.yres)
> + var->yres =
> + machine_data->fsl_diu_info[0]->var.yres
> + - mfbi->y_aoi_d;
> + } else { /* AOI0 is close */
> + if ((mfbi->y_aoi_d + var->yres) >
> + machine_data->fsl_diu_info[0]->var.yres)
> + mfbi->y_aoi_d =
> + machine_data->fsl_diu_info[0]->var.yres
> + - var->yres;
> + if (mfbi->y_aoi_d < 0)
> + mfbi->y_aoi_d = 0;
> + if ((var->yres + mfbi->y_aoi_d) >
> + machine_data->fsl_diu_info[0]->var.yres)
> + var->yres =
> + machine_data->fsl_diu_info[0]->var.yres
> + - mfbi->y_aoi_d;
Could you split some of this up into separate functions at lower
indentation levels to make it more readable?
> +#define CNVT_TOHW(val, width) ((((val)<<(width))+0x7FFF-(val))>>16)
> + red = CNVT_TOHW(red, info->var.red.length);
> + green = CNVT_TOHW(green, info->var.green.length);
> + blue = CNVT_TOHW(blue, info->var.blue.length);
> + transp = CNVT_TOHW(transp, info->var.transp.length);
> +#undef CNVT_TOHW
Define a function for this.
> + switch (cmd) {
> + case MFB_SET_PIXFMT:
> + if (!arg)
> + return -EINVAL;
> + if (copy_from_user((void *)&pix_fmt, (void *)arg,
> + sizeof(pix_fmt)))
(void __user *)arg
No cast on &pix_fmt.
> +#if defined(CONFIG_NOT_COHERENT_CACHE)
> + else if (status & INT_VSYNC) {
> + int i;
> + unsigned int *ptr;
> + ptr = coherence_data;
> + for (i = 0; i < 1024*8; i++)
> + *ptr++ = 0;
As I said in an internal review, this is not enough, and it's
inefficient. Read rather than write, and do so only once per cache
line, but the size you access has to be at least 13/8 of the cache size
for an 8-way plru cache.
-Scott
More information about the Linuxppc-dev
mailing list