Please pull linux-2.6-mpc52xx.git
Grant Likely
grant.likely at secretlab.ca
Wed Mar 26 05:51:41 EST 2008
On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 11:38 AM, Bartlomiej Sieka <tur at semihalf.com> wrote:
> Grant Likely wrote:
> > The one part that I have a really strong opinion on is that there
> > should be a full featured mpc5200 defconfig for build testing. Beyond
> > that (and if ojn can also be appeased) I can probably be convinced. :-)
>
> Hi Grant,
>
> How to deal with a situation where I need a particular PHY driver from
> libphy compiled in the kernel for one of the MPC5200 boards? Adding it
> to mpc5200_defconfig doesn't seem like a right thing to do.
Why not? mpc5200_defconfig is all about compile and runtime testing
on many platforms to make sure drivers play well together. I have no
problem adding more drivers to the mpc5200 defconfig. (In fact, I
encourage it).
> How to
> convince you (and appease ojn) to accept a patch that adds a
> board-specific defconfig that only slightly differs from
> mpc5200_defconfig? :)
I'm thinking 'optimized' defconfigs should go into a subdirectory.
Cheers,
g.
--
Grant Likely, B.Sc., P.Eng.
Secret Lab Technologies Ltd.
More information about the Linuxppc-dev
mailing list