Please pull linux-2.6-mpc52xx.git
Wolfgang Denk
wd at denx.de
Tue Mar 18 09:28:36 EST 2008
In message <fa686aa40803171443q7a53f0balbb49740116c6552 at mail.gmail.com> you wrote:
>
> b) defconfigs is more about testing and a known working configuration
> than it is about a distribution configuration. It's not intended to
> be the deployed config. For a distribution/deployable image it is
> expected that the engineer responsible will tailor the config.
This may be true in general, but for the boards in question it is
definitely incorrect:
* The TQM5200 configuration as provided is intended for shipping as
default configuration for this board. The "engineer responsible"
already *did* the tailoring and put that state in the defconfig
file.
* The CM5200 and Motion-Pro boards are custom designs, where the
defconfig file matches exactly the requirements of the respective
customers.
I feel it is very important to be able to include this configuration
information somewhere with the kernel source tree - and to me the
defconfig file for a board is the most natural place to put such
information.
Please understand that we do NOT expect the end user having to
"tailor the config" - instead, we want to provide a default
configuration that can be used as is, at least for default usage
cases.
If you don't want to use a board specific default configuration, then
please tell me what the recommended way is to provide a knwon to be
working, tested *and* *useful* default configuration for custom
boards in the Linux kernel tree?
> All these boards are supported with
> arch/powerpc/platforms/mpc5200_simple.c. A kernel built for that
> platform will boot on any of those boards as long as it is passed the
> correct device tree.
I don't doubt that the kernel will boot. But that does not mean that
it is ready for use for the intended purpose. For example,
arch/powerpc/platforms/52xx/motionpro.c contains code to setup some
custom LEDs on this board. I can't find that code in
arch/powerpc/platforms/mpc5200_simple.c.
It may be argued that this code should be moved somewhere else, but I
don't remeber to have seen any such review comments.
Best regards,
Wolfgang Denk
--
DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-10 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: wd at denx.de
You don't have to stay up nights to succeed; you have to stay awake
days.
More information about the Linuxppc-dev
mailing list