OF compatible MTD platform RAM driver ?

[Rune Torgersen]

David Gibson wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 12:00:22PM -0500, Rune Torgersen wrote:
>> We ran ito the same issue.
>> We did option 3, as it was efinetly the easiest,
> 
> I think this is the best option in principle.
> 
>> here is the sram entry in our dts:
> 
> Except that your implementation of it is not good.
> 
> You're relying on the old obsolete flash binding with the "probe-type"
> field.  The solution should be adapted to the new approach which uses
> values in the "compatible" field to indicate various sorts of flash
> device.

Yea, I know. But it was the easiest way of doing it at the time we did
our port....
In a timecrunch, easier is sometimes better than correct. :)