[PATCH 1/5] generic __remove_pages() support
Badari Pulavarty
pbadari at us.ibm.com
Sat Mar 8 03:36:21 EST 2008
Yasunori Goto wrote:
> Hi Badari-san.
>
>
>> On Thu, 2008-03-06 at 12:54 -0800, Dave Hansen wrote:
>>
>>> On Thu, 2008-03-06 at 10:55 -0800, Badari Pulavarty wrote:
>>>
>>>> + if (memmap)
>>>> + __kfree_section_memmap(memmap, PAGES_PER_SECTION);
>>>> + return;
>>>> + }
>>>> +
>>>> + /*
>>>> + * Allocations came from bootmem - how do I free up ?
>>>> + */
>>>> +
>>>>
>>> Shouldn't we figure this one out before merging?
>>>
>>> I think we at least need a printk() there.
>>>
>> I can add a printk(). I am hoping Yasunori Goto has something to
>> handle this, before we really merge into mainline.
>>
>
> Ah, yes.
> I'm making patches for around here. I'm sorry for your waiting.
>
> BTW, do you hurry for merging your patch?
> To be honest, I would like to solve not only here
> but also some other issues.
> But, if you hurry, I'll concentrate to solve only this.
>
> Bye.
>
>
I am hoping to get all of this merged into 2.6.26. Till then I would
like this to
be tested in -mm. I am not in a hurry, but I would like to make sure
some one is
working on the issue. Please let me know, if you have something to test
- I will
be happy to help out.
Thanks,
Badari
More information about the Linuxppc-dev
mailing list