[PATCH 2/11] celleb: move the base part for celleb support

[Ishizaki Kou]

Arnd Bergmann <arnd at arndb.de> wrote:
> On Wednesday 05 March 2008, Ishizaki Kou wrote:
> > This patch moves the base code for celleb support into platforms/cell/.
> > All files in this patch are used by celleb-beat and celleb-native commonly.
> 
> Moving around the files this way is good, but
> 
> > +++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/cell/Makefile       2008-03-04 14:00:28.000000000  +0900 
> > @@ -26,3 +26,20 @@
> >                                          ? spufs/
> > 
> >  obj-$(CONFIG_PCI_MSI)                  += axon_msi.o
> > +
> > +
> > +# celleb stuff
> > +ifeq ($(CONFIG_PPC_CELLEB),y)
> > +obj-y                                  += celleb_setup.o \
> > +                                          celleb_pci.o celleb_scc_epci.o \
> > +                                          celleb_scc_pciex.o \
> > +                                          celleb_scc_uhc.o \
> > +                                          beat.o beat_htab.o beat_hvCall.o \
> > +                                          beat_interrupt.o beat_iommu.o \
> > +                                          io-workarounds.o spider-pci.o
> > +
> > +obj-$(CONFIG_SMP)                      += beat_smp.o
> > +obj-$(CONFIG_PPC_UDBG_BEAT)            += beat_udbg.o
> > +obj-$(CONFIG_SERIAL_TXX9)              += celleb_scc_sio.o
> > +obj-$(CONFIG_SPU_BASE)                 += beat_spu_priv1.o
> > +endif
> 
> This looks like you are referencing files in the Makefile that are moved
> in the later patches. In order to make the git-bisect work correctly
> on the kernel after the patches are applied, I'd suggest either moving
> all files at once, or to modify the Makefile in every step of the way
> so that the kernel still builds.

Thanks for your advice.

I'll split changing the Makefile because the moving patches is too
large to be one patch.

Best regards,
Kou Ishizaki