[PATCH] add strncmp to PowerPC

[Segher Boessenkool]

>> Do we have any indication that it performs better than the C one ?
>
> I would expect it to, given that the assembler one has two branches in
> the per-byte loop compared to 3 in the C version.

But really, does it matter for strncmp() in the kernel?

Anyway, this asm code has bugs, as do both the current C version in the
kernel, and the code I posted.  We need to do better :-)


Segher