[PATCH][RT][PPC64] Fix preempt unsafe paths accessing per_cpu variables
Chirag Jog
chirag at linux.vnet.ibm.com
Mon Jul 21 20:23:39 EST 2008
Hi Benjamin
* Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh at kernel.crashing.org> [2008-07-19 08:05:30]:
>
> > With the original patch, the pending batch does get flushed
> > in a non-preemptable region.
> > I am resending the original with just adding the necesary comments.
>
> Your comment isn't what I meant. What I meant is that if the process
> is context switched while walking the page tables, the low level powerpc
> context switch code should also perform a ???__flush_tlb_pending.
Sorry, I misunderstood.
The powerpc context switch code does perform a __flush_tlb_pending.
Here is the patch
http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=119752629222720&w=2
> BTW. Is the pte_lock also not a real spinlock anymore ? That may break
> other assumptions the powerpc mm code is doing.
pte_lock is a not a real spinlock anymore.
> This -rt stuff is just too scary, it changes some fundamental semantics
> of the spinlocks. yuck.
>
> Ben.
>
>
More information about the Linuxppc-dev
mailing list