Calling the kernel from a mini-bootloader
Milton Miller
miltonm at bga.com
Sat Jul 19 03:47:08 EST 2008
On Jul 17, 2008, at 10:47 PM, David Gibson wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 11:14:11AM -0500, Milton Miller wrote:
>> On Thu Jul 17 at 23:22:28 EST in 2008, Guillaume Dargaud wrote:
> [snip]
[more snip]
>> We call this the flattened device tree.
>
> Your firmware doesn't have to deal with this though, although it can.
> It's perfectly acceptable - in fact I'd mildly recommend it over doing
> this in the firmware - to instead have the kernel's zImage wrapper
> supply the flattened device tree, folding information it needs to get
> from the firmware into it.
I thought about adding a section on which to recommend or talk about
the tradeoffs, but got hungry and hit send before going to lunch.
Yes, I the zImage choice is definitely the least amount of code to
write, and is a good tradeoff to get future upgradability. It may not
be the absolute fastest split of the work to start the kernel but it is
reasonably good, especially as it will decompress the kernel to its
run-time destination.
milton
More information about the Linuxppc-dev
mailing list