[PATCH] Support for DS75 thermal sensor

Jon Smirl jonsmirl at gmail.com
Thu Jul 17 00:18:26 EST 2008


On 7/16/08, Grant Likely <grant.likely at secretlab.ca> wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 12:10:59PM +0200, Jean Delvare wrote:
>  > On Wed, 16 Jul 2008 11:50:15 +0200, Wolfgang Grandegger wrote:
>  > > Jean Delvare wrote:
>  > >
>
> > > Yep, as probing might not be acceptable in some cases, I makes sense to
>  > > add a property to suppress probing:
>  >
>  > It'd rather make no-probing the default if possible. My understanding
>  > is that all systems using i2c-mpc should have proper platform data.
>
>
> Total ACK.  From my perspective, probing should be off by default because the
>  typical use case in powerpc land is to trust data in the device tree.  Add the
>  property to turn on probing, not to turn it off.  Also, you'll need to
>  document the semantics of such a property.  ie. what exactly does it
>  mean when the probing property is present and the spi bus node has child
>  nodes?

I've found this thread now. Why can't we totally remove probing from
i2c-mpc? These are embedded systems, not open boxes like a PC. If a
i2c client hasn't been converted to the new model yet, convert it
before deploying with the new i2c-mpc driver.  It's not very hard to
convert the client drivers.

-- 
Jon Smirl
jonsmirl at gmail.com



More information about the Linuxppc-dev mailing list