[PATCH] Support for DS75 thermal sensor
Jon Smirl
jonsmirl at gmail.com
Thu Jul 17 00:18:26 EST 2008
On 7/16/08, Grant Likely <grant.likely at secretlab.ca> wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 12:10:59PM +0200, Jean Delvare wrote:
> > On Wed, 16 Jul 2008 11:50:15 +0200, Wolfgang Grandegger wrote:
> > > Jean Delvare wrote:
> > >
>
> > > Yep, as probing might not be acceptable in some cases, I makes sense to
> > > add a property to suppress probing:
> >
> > It'd rather make no-probing the default if possible. My understanding
> > is that all systems using i2c-mpc should have proper platform data.
>
>
> Total ACK. From my perspective, probing should be off by default because the
> typical use case in powerpc land is to trust data in the device tree. Add the
> property to turn on probing, not to turn it off. Also, you'll need to
> document the semantics of such a property. ie. what exactly does it
> mean when the probing property is present and the spi bus node has child
> nodes?
I've found this thread now. Why can't we totally remove probing from
i2c-mpc? These are embedded systems, not open boxes like a PC. If a
i2c client hasn't been converted to the new model yet, convert it
before deploying with the new i2c-mpc driver. It's not very hard to
convert the client drivers.
--
Jon Smirl
jonsmirl at gmail.com
More information about the Linuxppc-dev
mailing list