[RFC] [PATCH] task_pt_regs for powerpc systems
Srinivasa D S
srinivasa at in.ibm.com
Tue Jul 15 19:21:00 EST 2008
On Monday 14 July 2008 11:06:47 pm Andreas Schwab wrote:
> Timur Tabi <timur at freescale.com> writes:
> > Srinivasa D S wrote:
> >> +#define task_pt_regs(tsk) (tsk)->thread.regs
> >
> > Shouldn't this be:
> >
> > #define task_pt_regs(tsk) ((tsk)->thread.regs)
> >
> > just to be safe?
>
> Both -> and . have already highest precedence as postfix operators.
>
Thanks for the comments, For safer side I have used "()" and sent the updated
patch.
Thanks
Srinivasa DS
More information about the Linuxppc-dev
mailing list