the printk problem
Ingo Molnar
mingo at elte.hu
Sun Jul 6 15:27:41 EST 2008
* Linus Torvalds <torvalds at linux-foundation.org> wrote:
> > Still all happily untested, of course. And still with no actual
> > users converted.
>
> Ok, it's tested, and here's an example usage conversion.
>
> The diffstat pretty much says it all. It _does_ change the format of
> the stack trace entry a bit, but I don't think it's for the worse
> (unless it breaks things like the oops tracker - Arjan?)
>
> It changes the symbol-in-module format from
>
> :ext3:add_dirent_to_buf+0x6c/0x26c
>
> to
>
> add_dirent_to_buf+0x6c/0x26c [ext3]
>
> but quite frankly, the latter was the standard format anyway (it's
> what "sprint_symbol()" gives you), and traps_64.c was the odd man out.
>
> In fact, traps_32.c already uses the standard print_symbol() format,
> so it really was an issue of the 64-bit code being odd (and I assume
> that this also means that it cannot break the oops tracker, since it
> already had to be able to handle both formats).
>
> I also removed the KALLSYMS dependency, so if KALLSYMS isn't enabled
> it will now give the same hex format twice, but I doubt we really care
> (such stack traces are unreadable whether it shows up once or twice,
> and the simplicity is worth it).
>
> If people do just a few more conversions like this, then the 52 added
> lines in lib/vsnprintf.c are more than made up for by removed lines
> elsewhere (and more readable source code).
applied (with the commit message below) to tip/x86/debug for v2.6.27
merging, thanks Linus. Can i add your SOB too?
Ingo
-------------------->
commit 4afd2534d6d4a77f4b7497c92f1ff7528d8f4eaa
Author: Linus Torvalds <torvalds at linux-foundation.org>
Date: Sat Jul 5 15:32:41 2008 -0700
x86, 64-bit: standardize printk_address()
Changes the symbol-in-module format from
:ext3:add_dirent_to_buf+0x6c/0x26c
to
add_dirent_to_buf+0x6c/0x26c [ext3]
the latter was the standard format anyway (it's what "sprint_symbol()"
gives you), and traps_64.c was the odd man out.
In fact, traps_32.c already uses the standard print_symbol() format, so
it really was an issue of the 64-bit code being odd (and I assume that
this also means that it cannot break the oops tracker, since it already
had to be able to handle both formats).
I also removed the KALLSYMS dependency, so if KALLSYMS isn't enabled it
will now give the same hex format twice, but I doubt we really care
(such stack traces are unreadable whether it shows up once or twice, and
the simplicity is worth it).
If people do just a few more conversions like this, then the 52 added
lines in lib/vsnprintf.c are more than made up for by removed lines
elsewhere (and more readable source code).
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo at elte.hu>
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/traps_64.c b/arch/x86/kernel/traps_64.c
index adff76e..f1a95d1 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/traps_64.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/traps_64.c
@@ -104,30 +104,7 @@ int kstack_depth_to_print = 12;
void printk_address(unsigned long address, int reliable)
{
-#ifdef CONFIG_KALLSYMS
- unsigned long offset = 0, symsize;
- const char *symname;
- char *modname;
- char *delim = ":";
- char namebuf[KSYM_NAME_LEN];
- char reliab[4] = "";
-
- symname = kallsyms_lookup(address, &symsize, &offset,
- &modname, namebuf);
- if (!symname) {
- printk(" [<%016lx>]\n", address);
- return;
- }
- if (!reliable)
- strcpy(reliab, "? ");
-
- if (!modname)
- modname = delim = "";
- printk(" [<%016lx>] %s%s%s%s%s+0x%lx/0x%lx\n",
- address, reliab, delim, modname, delim, symname, offset, symsize);
-#else
- printk(" [<%016lx>]\n", address);
-#endif
+ printk(" [<%016lx>] %s%pS\n", address, reliable ? "": "? ", (void *) address);
}
static unsigned long *in_exception_stack(unsigned cpu, unsigned long stack,
More information about the Linuxppc-dev
mailing list