[PATCH] powerpc/4xx: DTS: Add Add'l SDRAM0 Compatible and Interrupt Info

[Grant Erickson]

On 12/17/08 3:46 PM, David Gibson wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 11:56:07AM -0800, Grant Erickson wrote:
>> Added additional information for type and compatibility strings and
>> interrupt information to the SDRAM0 memory-controller device tree
>> nodes for AMCC PowerPC 405EX[r]-based boards to facilitate binding
>> with the new "ibm,sdram-4xx-ddr2" EDAC memory controller adapter driver.
>> 
>> Signed-off-by: Grant Erickson <gerickson at nuovations.com>
>> ---
>> As support in the associated EDAC adapter driver is added over time,
>> similar changes will/should be made to the DTS files for boards
>> leveraging realizations of this "ibm,sdram-4xx-ddr2" controller,
>> including the 440SP, 440SPe, 460EX, 460GT and 460SX.
>> 
>>  arch/powerpc/boot/dts/haleakala.dts |   11 ++++++++++-
>>  arch/powerpc/boot/dts/kilauea.dts   |   11 ++++++++++-
>>  arch/powerpc/boot/dts/makalu.dts    |   11 ++++++++++-
>>  3 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>> 
>> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/boot/dts/haleakala.dts
>> b/arch/powerpc/boot/dts/haleakala.dts
>> index 513bc43..e45ce7e 100644
>> --- a/arch/powerpc/boot/dts/haleakala.dts
>> +++ b/arch/powerpc/boot/dts/haleakala.dts
>> @@ -89,8 +89,17 @@
>> clock-frequency = <0>; /* Filled in by U-Boot */
>>  
>> SDRAM0: memory-controller {
>> -   compatible = "ibm,sdram-405exr";
>> +   device_type = "memory-controller";
> 
> This should not have a device_type.

I'm still growing my device tree expertise. Can you elaborate on why SDRAM0
shouldn't be described generically as a "memory-controller" device in the
same way the EMAC0 is generically described as a "network" device? A URL to
said elaboration would be sufficient.

>> +   compatible = "ibm,sdram-405exr", "ibm,sdram-4xx-ddr2";
>> dcr-reg = <0x010 0x002>;
>> +   #address-cells = <0>;
>> +   #size-cells = <0>;
> 
> This seems odd.  These should only be present if the node does, or at
> least can, have subnodes - I don't see that it would.

See above qualifier; will remove.

Thanks for the prompt review!

Regards,

Grant