[PATCH v2 2/4] powerpc: Fixes for CONFIG_PTE_64BIT for SMP support
Becky Bruce
becky.bruce at freescale.com
Sat Aug 30 01:50:21 EST 2008
On Aug 29, 2008, at 8:56 AM, Kumar Gala wrote:
> There are some minor issues with support 64-bit PTEs on a 32-bit
> processor
> when dealing with SMP.
>
> * We need to order the stores in set_pte_at to make sure the flag word
> is set second.
> * Change pte_clear to use pte_update so only the flag word is cleared
>
> Signed-off-by: Kumar Gala <galak at kernel.crashing.org>
>
> ---
> arch/powerpc/include/asm/pgtable-ppc32.h | 14 ++++++++++----
> 1 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/pgtable-ppc32.h b/arch/powerpc/
> include/asm/pgtable-ppc32.h
> index 6fe39e3..db2e7bd 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/pgtable-ppc32.h
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/pgtable-ppc32.h
> @@ -517,7 +517,7 @@ extern unsigned long
> bad_call_to_PMD_PAGE_SIZE(void);
>
> #define pte_none(pte) ((pte_val(pte) & ~_PTE_NONE_MASK) == 0)
> #define pte_present(pte) (pte_val(pte) & _PAGE_PRESENT)
> -#define pte_clear(mm,addr,ptep) do { set_pte_at((mm), (addr),
> (ptep), __pte(0)); } while (0)
> +#define pte_clear(mm,addr,ptep) do { pte_update(ptep, ~0, 0); }
> while (0)
>
> #define pmd_none(pmd) (!pmd_val(pmd))
> #define pmd_bad(pmd) (pmd_val(pmd) & _PMD_BAD)
> @@ -612,9 +612,6 @@ static inline unsigned long pte_update(pte_t *p,
> return old;
> }
> #else /* CONFIG_PTE_64BIT */
> -/* TODO: Change that to only modify the low word and move
> set_pte_at()
> - * out of line
> - */
> static inline unsigned long long pte_update(pte_t *p,
> unsigned long clr,
> unsigned long set)
> @@ -658,8 +655,17 @@ static inline void set_pte_at(struct mm_struct
> *mm, unsigned long addr,
> #if _PAGE_HASHPTE != 0
> pte_update(ptep, ~_PAGE_HASHPTE, pte_val(pte) & ~_PAGE_HASHPTE);
> #else
> +#if defined(CONFIG_PTE_64BIT) && defined(CONFIG_SMP)
> + __asm__ __volatile__("\
> + stw%U0%X0 %2,%0\n\
> + eieio\n\
> + stw%U0%X0 %L2,%1"
> + : "=m" (*ptep), "=m" (*((unsigned char *)ptep+4))
> + : "r" (pte) : "memory");
I know it's a nit, but can you put the clobber on a new line? I
totally missed it the first time I read this, and got all worked up
about it :)
Cheers,
B
More information about the Linuxppc-dev
mailing list