[PATCH 0/3]: Sparc OF I2C support.
Jon Smirl
jonsmirl at gmail.com
Fri Aug 22 09:45:23 EST 2008
On 8/21/08, Grant Likely <grant.likely at secretlab.ca> wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 21, 2008 at 3:35 PM, Scott Wood <scottwood at freescale.com> wrote:
> > David Miller wrote:
> >>>
> >>> On Thu, Aug 21, 2008 at 12:10:12AM -0700, David Miller wrote:
>
> >> If you guys created this format in your compressed openfirmware
> >> trees, is it possible for you to "fix" it to match what Sparc
> >> systems following the proper bindings do?
> >
> > Possibly, though it'll cause some pain when old trees are used with a kernel
> > that expects the new binding.
>
>
> Ugh, more like loads of pain. There are deployed platforms using the
> embedded 'invented' bindings. I don't think it is an option to break
> compatibility with older trees. If there is some backwards
> compatibility code then I'm all for migrating to the same binding as
> Sparc and PowerMac
Has anything really been deployed? These bindings are only a few months old.
--
Jon Smirl
jonsmirl at gmail.com
More information about the Linuxppc-dev
mailing list