[PATCH 1/3]: sparc: Implement irq_of_parse_and_map() and irq_dispose_mapping().

[Anton Vorontsov]

On Thu, Aug 21, 2008 at 12:10:17AM -0700, David Miller wrote:
> 
> sparc: Implement irq_of_parse_and_map() and irq_dispose_mapping().
> 
> This allows more OF layer code to be shared between powerpc and
> sparc.
> 
> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem at davemloft.net>
> ---
>  arch/sparc/include/asm/prom.h   |    8 ++++++++
>  arch/sparc/kernel/of_device.c   |   11 +++++++++++
>  arch/sparc64/kernel/of_device.c |   11 +++++++++++
>  3 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/sparc/include/asm/prom.h b/arch/sparc/include/asm/prom.h
> index b5efc4d..58b85fa 100644
> --- a/arch/sparc/include/asm/prom.h
> +++ b/arch/sparc/include/asm/prom.h
> @@ -96,6 +96,14 @@ static inline void of_node_put(struct device_node *node)
>  {
>  }
>  
> +/* These routines are here to provide compatibility with how powerpc
> + * handles IRQ mapping for OF device nodes.  We precompute and permanently
> + * register them in the of_device objects, whereas powerpc computes them
> + * on request.
> + */
> +extern int irq_of_parse_and_map(struct device_node *node, int index);

On powerpc irq_of_parse_and_map() returns unsigned type.

> +#define irq_dispose_mapping(irq) do { } while (0)

I'd rather write it as a static inline function, for type checking,
plus, I think with this macros gcc may generate warnings about
defined but unused variables.

> +
>  /*
>   * NB:  This is here while we transition from using asm/prom.h
>   * to linux/of.h
> diff --git a/arch/sparc/kernel/of_device.c b/arch/sparc/kernel/of_device.c
> index cc4c235..56e9a71 100644
> --- a/arch/sparc/kernel/of_device.c
> +++ b/arch/sparc/kernel/of_device.c
> @@ -29,6 +29,17 @@ struct of_device *of_find_device_by_node(struct device_node *dp)
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL(of_find_device_by_node);
>  
> +int irq_of_parse_and_map(struct device_node *node, int index)
> +{
> +	struct of_device *op = of_find_device_by_node(node);
> +
> +	if (!op || index >= op->num_irqs)
> +		return 0xffffffff;

This is valid virq, unfortunately. There is only one invalid virq: 0.
With this most drivers will fail to identify 'there is no irq' case.
Does virq0 has special meaning on sparc?

Thanks,

-- 
Anton Vorontsov
email: cbouatmailru at gmail.com
irc://irc.freenode.net/bd2