[PATCH 1/9] powerpc/44x: Add PowerPC 44x simple platform support
Josh Boyer
jwboyer at linux.vnet.ibm.com
Thu Aug 21 03:35:00 EST 2008
On Wed, 20 Aug 2008 10:19:02 -0700
Roland Dreier <rdreier at cisco.com> wrote:
> > Except that logically doesn't make much sense. Why would you have a
> > list of mpc52xx and 44x boards together? They require completely
> > different kernels because the MMU and drive set is entirely different.
> >
> > Or am I totally missing what you are saying?
>
> Yeah, I wasn't clear -- I meant to add a new helper like
> of_flat_dt_is_compatible_list() (not sure of the name) that takes a node
> and a NULL-terminated array of strings, and then mpc5200_simple_probe()
> can become a one-liner, along with mpc5121_generic_probe(),
> tqm85xx_probe(), ppc44x_probe(), etc.
Ah, I see.
I worry about doing that though. I don't want to give people the
impression that these boards are "of" compatible. I want it to be more
"this file supports these explicit platforms and makes no claim on
compatibility between them".
josh
More information about the Linuxppc-dev
mailing list