ftrace introduces instability into kernel 2.6.27(-rc2,-rc3)
Steven Rostedt
rostedt at goodmis.org
Thu Aug 21 01:27:47 EST 2008
On Wed, 20 Aug 2008, Eran Liberty wrote:
> >
> >
> > > c00bb670: 41 9e 00 50 beq- cr7,c00bb6c0 <__d_lookup+0x13c>
> > > c00bb674: 83 de 00 00 lwz r30,0(r30)
> > > c00bb678: 2f 9e 00 00 cmpwi cr7,r30,0
> > > c00bb67c: 40 9e ff 98 bne+ cr7,c00bb614 <__d_lookup+0x90>
> > > c00bb680: 38 60 00 00 li r3,0
> > > c00bb684: 81 61 00 00 lwz r11,0(r1)
> > > c00bb688: 80 0b 00 04 lwz r0,4(r11)
> > > c00bb68c: 7d 61 5b 78 mr r1,r11
> > >
> >
> > [ BUG HERE IF INTERRUPT HAPPENS ]
> >
> >
> > > c00bb690: bb 0b ff e0 lmw r24,-32(r11)
> > > c00bb694: 7c 08 03 a6 mtlr r0
> > > c00bb698: 4e 80 00 20 blr
> > >
> >
> > Yep, you have the same bug in your compiler.
> >
> > -- Steve
> >
> Hmm... so whats now?
Try anothe gcc version ;-)
>
> Is there a way to prove this scenario is indeed the one that caused the opps?
I'm not convinced that this is the bug you were seeing. Do you still get
the crash if you disable dynamic ftrace but leave ftrace on?
-- Steve
More information about the Linuxppc-dev
mailing list