[PATCH] powerpc: EOI spurious irqs during boot so they can be reenabled later

[Michael Ellerman]

On Tue, 2008-08-05 at 18:48 +0200, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> > So when we receive a spurious irq, EOI it, and then mask it.
> 
> What happens when a new IRQ arrives on the interrupt controller
> between these EOI and mask calls?  Should you instead first mask
> it, and only then EOI it?  Or doesn't that work on XICS?

Yeah right, in which case we'd have not EOI'ed that one and we're back
at square one.

It seems to work with a mask then EOI, so unless Milton says otherwise
I'll do it that way - new patch coming.

cheers

-- 
Michael Ellerman
OzLabs, IBM Australia Development Lab

wwweb: http://michael.ellerman.id.au
phone: +61 2 6212 1183 (tie line 70 21183)

We do not inherit the earth from our ancestors,
we borrow it from our children. - S.M.A.R.T Person
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://lists.ozlabs.org/pipermail/linuxppc-dev/attachments/20080806/975b4eeb/attachment.pgp>