[PATCH 1/2] powerpc: ptrace CHECK_FULL_REGS
benh at kernel.crashing.org
Tue Sep 25 13:58:46 EST 2007
On Mon, 2007-09-24 at 17:59 -0700, Roland McGrath wrote:
> > Yup, I think I ditched most of them.. for some reason I decided it
> > couldn't happen, but maybe I'm wrong ?
> Well, it's a BUG_ON. It's supposed to be for something that "can't happen".
> That's why it's a sanity check, not a wild assertion. ;-)
> The 2/2 patch is an example of a bug that CHECK_FULL_REGS catches.
> In the status quo, using PTRACE_PEEKUSR in a bug case crashes while using
> PTRACE_GETREGS in the same place might get bogus data. (In the actual bug
> thus found, the data is not bogus and only the bit that FULL_REGS checks is.)
More information about the Linuxppc-dev