RFC: replace device_type with new "class" property?
Scott Wood
scottwood at freescale.com
Tue Oct 30 06:44:00 EST 2007
Yoder Stuart-B08248 wrote:
> Here's an example of what I'm trying to get at-- take
> a node from a FSL device tree. The ideas I've heard
> for expressing the class are like this--
>
> #1 don't express any class at all:
>
> ucc at 2200 {
> compatible = "fsl,ucc_geth";
> model = "UCC";
> device-id = <3>;
> reg = <2200 200>;
> interrupts = <22>;
> interrupt-parent = < &qeic >;
> mac-address = [ 00 00 00 00 00 00 ];
> local-mac-address = [ 00 00 00 00 00 00 ];
> rx-clock = <19>;
> tx-clock = <1a>;
> phy-handle = < &phy3 >;
> pio-handle = < &pio3 >;
Of course, this should properly be something like
ethernet at 2200 {
compatible = "fsl,mpc8360-qe-enet", "fsl,qe-enet";
local-mac-address = [ 00 00 00 00 00 00 ];
...
};
With no "mac-address", and a more useful "model" if any at all.
-Scott
More information about the Linuxppc-dev
mailing list