[PATCH v4] FEC - fast ethernet controller for mpc52xx
Domen Puncer
domen.puncer at telargo.com
Fri Oct 26 05:41:14 EST 2007
On 25/10/07 11:57 -0700, Dale Farnsworth wrote:
> Domen wrote:
> > > use your platform's dma mapping functions, rather than virt_to_phys()
> > >
> > > it might be the exact same implementation, inside the platform
> > > internals, but drivers should not be using this directly.
> >
> > I've replaced this with dma_map_single(), unmatched with
> > dma_unmap_single(), since bestcomm doesn't have a way to do that
> > and it's blank on ppc32 anyway.
> >
> > Is this OK? PPC guys?
>
> Even though dma_unmap_single() may be a no-op, calls to
> dma_map_single() must be matched with calls to dma_unmap_single().
>
> Perhaps with the additions below:
>
> > +static void mpc52xx_fec_free_rx_buffers(struct bcom_task *s)
> > +{
> > + struct sk_buff *skb;
> > +
> > + while (!bcom_queue_empty(s)) {
> > + skb = bcom_retrieve_buffer(s, NULL, NULL);
>
> dma_unmap_single(&skb->dev->dev, skb-data,
> FEC_RX_BUFFER_SIZE, DMA_FROM_DEVICE);
It looks to me like dma_unmap_single takes the mapped address
(what dma_map_single returned), and not the address we're mapping
(skb->data).
Domen
More information about the Linuxppc-dev
mailing list