[linux-usb-devel] [PATCH 1/2] USB: Rework OHCI PPC OF for new bindings

[Matt Sealey]

Valentine,

Please do the very minimal required to keep supporting the Efika.

As for an little endian OHCI controller on an OF bus, I would not
consider it an impossibility. But, not having the big-endian
property fixes this; OHCI is little-endian by default. You need
only report "difference" in device trees, overzealous naming of
a billion kinds of 99.99999% compatible controllers is just a
waste of space.

I prefer the new binding to a degree. I like the big-endian property
and I like the reporting of a standard controller type (usb-ohci
rather than building in chip names). However by making the driver
support only the recommending binding, we break old platforms for
the sake of making new ones cleaner.

I wish someone would have sat down and defined the 5200 device
tree in a design committee rather than a peer review post-commit
system. In fact, that is a great idea, we can start this off with
the MPC5121E right now, and get the damn thing RIGHT.

-- 
Matt Sealey <matt at genesi-usa.com>
Genesi, Manager, Developer Relations

Valentine Barshak wrote:
> Grant Likely wrote:
>> On 10/25/07, Valentine Barshak <vbarshak at ru.mvista.com> wrote:
>>> Grant Likely wrote:
>>>> On 10/24/07, David Brownell <david-b at pacbell.net> wrote:
>>>>> On Wednesday 24 October 2007, Matt Sealey wrote:
>>>>>> Can we just make sure real quickly that the changing of compatibles
>>>>>> doesn't break existing, not-easily-flashable firmwares?
>>>>> Yeah, I'm not keen on such breakage either...
>>>> Add my voice to the chorus.  It's okay to change the binding, but make
>>>> sure the old binding is still supported.
>>>>
>>>> Cheers,
>>>> g.
>>>>
>>> Actually, I thought that changing the DTS stuff for mpc52xx boards would
>>> suffice. Sorry, I was unaware of Efika firmware here. I'll keep old
>>> bindings as well.
>>
>> Even if that were the case; I'm nervous about breaking compatibility
>> with old device trees.
> 
> If we keep the old bindings intact in the driver code then the old dts 
> files should work fine. But I'm starting to doubt we really need any new 
> bindings for this if we still have to keep the old ones.
> BTW, does anybody know of any ohci-le devices on OF bus?
> Thanks,
> Valentine.
> 
>>
>> We probably need a formal guideline here.  ie. When is it okay to drop
>> compatibility with old dts files?
>>
>>> Does the device tree have "ohci-bigendian" or "ohci-be" compatible
>>> property on Efika?
>>
>> If it doesn't, it can be added during prom_init.c  We're already doing
>> a bunch of efika fixups there anyway.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> g.
>>
>