[PATCH] PowerPC 440EPx Sequoia USB OHCI DTS entry

[Dale Farnsworth]

On Wed, Oct 24, 2007 at 05:44:51PM +0400, Valentine Barshak wrote:
> Dale Farnsworth wrote:
> >On Wed, Oct 24, 2007 at 03:19:14PM +0400, Valentine Barshak wrote:
> >>Dale Farnsworth wrote:
> >>>Valentine wrote:
> >>>>Actually I also don't see much reason for the 
> >>>>USB_OHCI_HCD_PPC_OF_BE/USB_OHCI_HCD_PPC_OF_LE stuff.
> >>>>Is this really needed?
> >>>I think so.  The SOC host controllers are BE and the PCI
> >>>host controllers are LE.  Or, do you have an alternative
> >>>method of handling both types?
> >>Yes, PCI controllers are LE, but do we really need user-selectable 
> >>USB_OHCI_HCD_PPC_OF_LE option, since USB_OHCI_LITTLE_ENDIAN is selected
> >>by default for USB_OHCI_HCD_PCI?
> >>The USB_OHCI_HCD_PPC_OF_LE/BE stuff is related to PPC OF glue only.
> >>I think it's useless. We should always enable
> >>USB_OHCI_BIG_ENDIAN_DESC and USB_OHCI_BIG_ENDIAN_MMIO for PPC OF
> >>and the real LE/BE implementation should be selected by the 
> >>corresponding properties in the device tree.
> >
> >I agree that they don't need to be user selectable.  It is far preferable
> >to deduce their values from existing information, if possible.
> >
> >-Dale
> 
> This is the original thread:
> http://ozlabs.org/pipermail/linuxppc-embedded/2006-November/025054.html
> 
> I think the USB_OHCI_HCD_PPC_OF_LE/BE should be removed.
> We can't avoid the slight overhead even using these options, since 
> USB_OHCI_BIG_ENDIAN_MMIO/DESC should always be anabled for PPC OF and we 
> we still enable USB_OHCI_LITTLE_ENDIAN for USB_OHCI_HCD_PCI even if 
> USB_OHCI_HCD_PPC_OF_LE is not set.

I believe you are saying that we can select any valid combination
of USB_OHCI_BIG_ENDIAN_DESC, USB_OHCI_BIG_ENDIAN_MMIO, and
USB_OHCI_LITTLE_ENDIAN, without using USB_OHCI_HCD_PPC_OF_BE and
USB_OHCI_HCD_PPC_OF_LE.  I agree.  It looks like we can get rid of
these last two with zero loss in performance or functionality.

Do you have a patch?

-Dale