[PATCH] synchronize_irq needs a barrier
Benjamin Herrenschmidt
benh at kernel.crashing.org
Sat Oct 20 15:46:24 EST 2007
> I probably need to add this synchronize_irq() logic in dmfe.c too, but I probably do it later,
> I think I am overestimating this race, since most drivers don't do dev->insuspend checks in IRQ handler.
> Maybe even just use free_irq() after all....
Most drivers are probably underestimating the race :-)
free_irq() would work provided that you did the masking on chip before
(and unmask only after request_irq on the way back in). But it's a bit
like using a 10 tons truck to crush an ant...
Ben.
More information about the Linuxppc-dev
mailing list